Thursday, March 27, 2008

The Order Vol. 1: The Next Right Thing



The Order Vol. 1: The Next Right Thing
By Matt Fraction and Barry Kitson
Marvel Comics, 2008

Garrett Martin: There have been a lot of comics that deal with the celebrity aspect of being a superhero, but The Order is the only one I can think of that's about celebrities actually turning into superheroes (well, except for KISS, and Don Rickles, and like the WWF Superstars, or something). The Order is a team of "real life" "heroes" (a soldier, a stand-out athlete, a model who opens orphanages around the world, etc.) artificially given superpowers by Tony "Iron Man" Stark in order to better serve their community; after a year all powers are deactivated and a new group of heroes will replace the old. Matt Fraction does a good job making obvious references to various real-life celebrities (and celebrity archetypes) without patterning the characters too closely on real people. Still, I don't quite get how the Britney Spears / Paris Hilton analogue was any form of hero, outside of being marketed as a symbol of some vague form of "girl power". But what doyou think the superhero aspect lends to this sort of social / celebrity commentary, if anything?

Hillary Brown: My initial thoughts are that I'm pretty sorry it got canceled. I think the slow build-up with each issue serving as an introduction to a character (and not in the usual "origin" sort of way, as we know a little bit about how they got their powers, and it was all through the same process). We get to infer a good bit about why they ended up with the powers they did (e.g., woman who wants badly to have children but can't gets the power to create golems from the earth in a weirdly literal interpretation of the term "earth mother") as well as contemplate exactly the sort of stuff you're talking about. That is: why these people and not others? Clearly that's what Fraction is interested in, as four of the people you originally think you'll be going along for the ride with get fired very early on. Not to spoil the Psycho-esque surprise or anything...

I think one of the major concerns is not so much how heroic they've already been, although some have, but more what potential do they have. This is especially true in the Becky Ryan/Britney Spears case, where she's more of a hero in the sense that she's already famous and people look up to her, even though she hasn't done anything "heroic"per se yet. And it's not completely clear that she or any of them well. It's all Iron Man's little social experiment, and the possibility of real failure makes it more interesting than the usual gang of superheroes stories.

That said, the narrative arc definitely still seems to be finding its way, which is all the more shame that it won't continue. It's a bit scattershot in issues 1 through 5, which make up this first volume, and even the second issue seems to reintroduce a lot of exposition, incase you didn't pick up the first book or something. Who are the bad guys? Are we going to have that much of a continuous story? It does, however, do a very good job of mentioning the "Civil War" stuff briefly and clearly. I'm not familiar with any of that, and I expected that I might be a bit lost, but it doesn't seem to play a large role.

GM: Unfortunately the cancellation totally screwed up the book's pacing, as the latest (monthly) issue packs two or three issues' worth of story into twenty-two pages. There is an overarching villain, and you do see him in this first trade paperback, but after buildingslowly in the first few issues everything is revealed so suddenly that you can tell Fraction had to cut some corners in order to get to his big climax. I don't want to spoil anything, but the bad guys do thematically mirror the Order, only if they were run by McCarthy (orSean Hannity) instead of Tony Stark.

The "job interview" sequences do work great as character introductions, and Fraction has kept that up throughout the series thus far. It's a nifty device, having the characters basically address the reader directly in a way that still makes sense and fits naturally within the narrative. It's breaking the fourth wall without actually breaking anything. It also allows Fraction to dig into who they are as people, not just as celebrities or superheroes, without resorting to the sort of soap opera psychobabble that lately defines"realistic" character development in superhero comics. And by establishing the Order as people first and heroes second (or even third), Fraction's able to slightly subvert your typical superhero comic conception of heroism. The only times the Order really succeed,both personally and as a superhero group, come when they stop to think and talk abouttheir problems, and not from blind kicking and 'sploding.

And yeah, although The Order springs directly from Civil War, it could easily exist without those crossovers. There's no way Marvel ever would've released it without that launching pad, though. Even with its connection to one of the best-selling comics of the decade, The Order didn't sell at all. New concepts and characters almost always tank in comics, and Fraction indulges in a moment of meta-commentary when he has Tony Stark's PR lady pretty much say exactly that in The Order. Fraction will be writing a new on-going Iron Man title that starts in May, and hopefully he'll be using some of his characters from this book. If he doesn't kill them all in the last issue, whichhappens far too often with unpopular comics.

HB: So should we talk about the art briefly? It's always surprising to me how much of a difference I see between a trade printed on coated paper and a trade printed on uncoated paper. The Order, of course, is printed on coated, which lends it a slicker look, and there are some panels that are clearly digitally created, with blurring of the background that kind of gets on my nerves. I appreciate the creativity of different ways of conveying text (thoughts, settings, communication over various headsets), but sometimes it's a little much and the panels can get kind of crowded. I guess I'd come down as seeing BarryKitson as more workmanlike than anything else. I'm never awed at the beauty of particular pages, but it mostly doesn't annoy me, which, sometimes, is all one can ask for.

GM: I've always liked Kitson's art, but I'd never buy a comic just because he drew it. You can always tell what's happening in a Kitson comic, as his figures, action, and storytelling are all clear and direct, but it's never the most stylistic artwork out there. He'smore than serviceable, but not in any way exceptional. Unfortunately being perfectly acceptable means he's near the upper echelon of current superhero artists, I think. In fact he's one of my favorite artists that can be accurately labeled as working in the "house" style of either DC or Marvel, meaning he creates exactly what you expect from a superhero comic, without transcending those expectations in any way. He lacks the style and design sense of a Darwyn Cooke or JH Williams III, but is clearly more competent than the guy drawing vaguely X-related product #8, or whatever. And since The Order isstill a superhero comic, and perfectly content with being a superhero comic, and not really trying to deconstruct the genre like Watchmen or a Grant Morrison comic, Kitson's kind of a perfect fit.

You are precisely... my cup of tea

1. Who are you, anyway?

Oh, hi. I'm Hillary Brown. I live in Athens, Georgia. Google me or something. I have at least one other blog (here), and I do a bunch of freelance writing as well, although none of it about comics yet.

2. What's your history with comics?

I grew up reading Asterix and Obelix and Tintin but didn't really think about the form that much. You know, kids' books have pictures. That's how it is. At my elementary school, each classroom had a library, and there was one in particular (maybe fourth grade) that had a lot of neat little compilations of old comics: Captain Marvel, Doctor Strange, Wonder Woman. I don't remember much about them, but I definitely enjoyed them. Around that same time, I bought a lot of Archie comics and Richie Rich and other stuff of the sort at yard sales and the Lakewood Antiques Market, but I don't know what happened to these. Over the past year or so, I've gotten much more into comics. I still don't buy the individual issues as they come out (except the new one of All-Star Superman, which I bought today because we're going to cover it on here), but I like buying the trades. Where did this interest come from? Partially my husband (his blog is here) and partially, most likely, because reading comics is such a relief after all the other stuff I've been reading for some years now. I'm working, very slowly, on my PhD in English, with a specialty in Renaissance literature, which means that I read a lot of fat books full of rhetoric. I love those too. But the speed of comics appeals to me, and I like the fact that they're often driven by plot. Also, there's art. I like art a ton.

3. First comic you can remember reading?

Other than the couple mentioned above, I remember reading Beccassine when I was pretty young. It's a French comic book for children about an absent-minded maid. Picture a younger Amelia Bedelia but more countrified. She puts curling papers in the leaves of the lettuce to make them take on the correct shape and so on. Sadly, I can't find any images online, but I'm sure the broad, simple, colorful drawings helped shape my sensibility.

4. Favorite writer?

You know, these are dumb questions. There are loads of people I like who both write and draw. But I'm going to say Brian K. Vaughn because he generally doesn't disappoint, and, while he has his own style, he doesn't have any tics that get on my nerves. He also knows both how to explore interesting themes and keep the pace fairly quick. Plus, great dialogue.

5. Favorite artist?

I would love to get a page of Charles Burns's. Hard to find, though. I'm also nuts about Tony Harris's covers, with their art nouveau swoopiness and highly patterned look.

6. What comic books would you like to hear God say he reads?

If he could read David Yoder's stuff, that would say good things about him and his capacity to be amused by us.

here is this guy; meet him!

1. Who are you, anyway?

Hi, I'm Garrett Martin, a reader of comics. Sometimes I write about what I read at the Kindercore blog. I also write about other stuff for other websites and publications. It is a hobby that occasionally pays very little.

2. What's your history with comics?

I’ve been reading ‘em since before I can remember. Papa had a box full of Disney, Harvey, and Looney Toon comics that we’d read together whenever my family was visiting. My older brothers had a bunch of late ‘70’s / early ‘80’s Marvel and DC books, and I read those things over and over. Didn’t start buying my own ‘til I was 9, and mostly picked those up from the local Quik-Stop and a couple of mall bookstores. Also bought tons of Archie digests at the Kash ‘n’ Karry. Discovered my first comic book shop one town over when I was 10 or 11, and made monthly trips there. By 12 I had my first pull-list, full of nothing but mainstream superhero comics, and my development was well on its way to being arrested. Kept that up ‘til I was 17, when music and other stuff monopolized my fun-time bucks. Also didn’t help that every shop within a 20-minute drive shut down on the same day. I pretty much avoided comics until a couple of years ago, when I realized I could afford ‘em and could definitely use the escapism. I still largely stick to spandex-wearing dudes punching each other in mid-air, but do read the occasional indie or manga or whatever.

3. First comic you can remember reading?

The first comic that made a strong impression was a ‘70’s reprint of Avengers #72, the first appearance of the Zodiac crime cartel. The Zodiac remains criminally underused, by the way.

4. Favorite writer?

Grant Morrison

5. Favorite artist?

all-time: Jack Kirby
currently active: Darwyn Cooke

6. What comic books would you like to hear God say he reads?

Owly and All-Star Superman #10, so he can pick up a few tricks.

What in the heck we are doing

Why? Why must we start another blog? Well, we tried to get paid for this sort of thing, but it didn't work out, and we still have these burning opinions about comic books, so we might as well release them, like these balloon lanterns. Perhaps our opinions will spread joy and beauty. Or perhaps they will just scare animals and set trees on fire.

The brief premise of this blog is consideration, mostly in dialogue form, although probably not exclusively, of comic books in some sort of depth. One of us (Garrett) is a boy and knows more things about comic books, and the other is a girl (Hillary, me) and knows less about the history of the thing but is enthused. So we believe in knowing things, and we also believe in the freshness that can come from not. We have some other blogs too.

I think I'm going to come up with a brief Proust questionnaire for further introduction, but for now this thing is officially born, squalling and gross and red. Woo!